In March 2023 a man came to a urologist in Haryana with a 20 mm stone in his left kidney. Routine work. An infection was cleared, a stent went in to keep the kidney draining, and a date was fixed. On the morning the plan changed. The scope went up the natural passage as agreed, but one fragment was too big to come out that way, so the surgeon went in through the flank instead(PCNL). Two operations in one sitting, consent signed for both. He went home in two days.

Then the bleeding would not stop. Clots blocked his urine twice, and the stent came out in case it was the source. It wasn't. An ultrasound found something 3.5 cm across inside the kidney and called it clot. He was referred to Delhi the next day. Angiography there found the real cause, a pseudoaneurysm, a torn branch artery bleeding into the urine. They sealed it off and he went home. Twelve days under one roof. One day under another.

No expert was asked how the operation had been done, and the order names no technical error. The commission held it negligent anyway, the late referral and the surgery itself. The reason was the paperwork. Both discharge summaries recorded only the first operation. The second one appears in writing for the first time in the referral letter, written the day he was sent to Delhi still bleeding. ₹2 lakh against a ₹50 lakh claim, paid by his indemnity insurer.

Two days before Christmas, a 76-year-old woman came through the emergency department of a Delhi super-speciality hospital, and somewhere in that first assessment her file picked up chronic kidney disease. She had never had it. Her renal function tests were normal and there was no history of it anywhere in the record. Seven days later, while she was still on the ward, the hospital put in a written correction as a dated addendum, sitting beside the original entry instead of replacing it.

Her insurer refused cashless cover anyway, so she paid ₹3.87 lakh herself and then spent four months sending records, clarifications and a sworn affidavit from her treating doctor about the entry he had already corrected. The claim was rejected for want of mandatory documents. Niva Bupa then let its own window to file a defence lapse, and the case went to judgment with nothing on record from the insurer's side: ₹3.87 lakh returned, ₹50,000 for mental agony, ₹35,000 in costs, 6% interest running from the day it said no.

Four things about that addendum are what made it hold up, and every one of them is inside your control on any shift.

Read →

The Supreme Court gave bail on Thursday to Sandip Ghosh, principal of RG Kar when a postgraduate trainee was found dead there in August 2024. This is the CBI's corruption case, about tenders and merit scores, not the rape and murder. Justices Sundresh and Varale overturned the Calcutta High Court's refusal on that arithmetic alone. The victim's father has blamed the agency, and the junior doctors who led the 2024 cease-work say the anger is back. No court has convicted him of anything and bail is not acquittal. But two years ago doctors across the country stopped work and were told the system would deliver.

Read →

Round 1, All India Quota, 2025. Half of all open seats were gone by rank 2,993, and at rank 5,000 only thirty-one colleges were still taking open candidates. Between ranks 7,072 and 25,000 there was no free MD seat anywhere in the country, but 425 open DNB Paediatrics seats, which is the number worth carrying into a counselling conversation. Last ranks elsewhere were EWS 11,024, OBC-NCL 10,534, SC 22,979 and ST 47,281. All 4,048 seats are in the guide, college by college.

Read →

Know a colleague who should be reading this? Forward this email to them.

Forwarded this issue? Subscribe free →