Good morning. Yesterday we told you what the residents at AIIMS Jodhpur were asking for. This morning the Health Ministry has answered them on a single page, and the answer is most interesting for the words it leaves out. We read it clause by clause against what was announced outside.
— DR. ADITYA SETH, EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
01 · THE LEAD
DOCTORS
AIIMS Jodhpur Director ‘Removed’? What the Order Says
A resident doctor died. The residents struck. On Sunday the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare answered with an office order: one page, three clauses, and the word “removed” is not in any of them.
Dr Goverdhan Dutt Puri is told to report to the Ministry in New Delhi with immediate effect and remain available for duties as assigned. The same sentence calls him the present Executive Director, AIIMS Jodhpur. Come to Delhi, and wait.
AIIMS Jammu’s director, Prof (Dr) Sanjeev Sinha, picks up Jodhpur as additional charge. He keeps Jammu, draws no extra pay, and holds Jodhpur until further orders. A five-member faculty committee has five days to come into existence and support him. The announcement outside said four professors.
The residents filed four demands on 23 September: an apology and an account of what happened; ₹5 crore, with the family’s dues and entitlements released; accountability, and the Executive Director’s resignation; formal recognition of the RDA and the Student Union. None of the four appears in the order. Neither does a reason, a finding or a timeline. What the preamble does say is that the arrangements are for immediate implementation, to restore normal academic and institutional functioning, which is the administrative way of asking everyone to go back to work.
WHY IT MATTERS
Additional charge is not a replacement. Jammu’s director keeps Jammu, gets no extra pay, and holds Jodhpur until further orders. The arrangement is temporary by its own wording.
The order records no finding of fault. No inquiry is named, no resignation is accepted, no reason is given. Nothing in it can be cited later as a conclusion about anybody’s conduct.
Four demands went in on 23 September. Zero appear in the order. The apology, the money, the accountability and the recognition of the RDA are all still open questions.
02 · CLINICAL
The D-dimer number that decides who gets a CT just got its biggest test yet
A 78-year-old with pleuritic chest pain and a D-dimer of 620. The old rule scans him. The age-adjusted rule sends him home. Twelve thousand patients later, somebody has finally counted who was right, and every single miss came from the same narrow slice of numbers.
Dengue made simple: the platelet count is not the patient
Everyone watches the platelets. The patient who is about to crash is giving himself away somewhere else: a creeping diastolic, a narrowing pulse pressure, cold fingers, and a systolic reading that still looks perfectly respectable. Part I, on finding shock before the blood pressure falls.
03 · PHARMA
FDA approves Juvmo, the once-a-day Parkinson’s pill AbbVie paid $8.7 billion for
Every oral dopamine agonist on your pad knocks on D2 and D3. This one goes to D1 and D5 instead, and only half-opens the door. AbbVie bought the molecule with a whole company and has said nothing about price or launch date, which tells you who it is being priced for.
04 · QUICK HITS
Built by doctors. Read by doctors.
Know a colleague who should be reading this? Forward this email to them.
Forwarded this issue? Subscribe free →